http://forum.digital-seas.com/ the place for exchanging ideas and opinions on ship-spotting and ship-tracking en Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:55:58 +0000 http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1678 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:17:58 +0000 MindOpen 1678@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob: thanks for the remarks, will replay they first (sounds like a script error), the second should be a good thing to have. I will adress this to Markus for programming, since I am off to my summer holidays... :-) </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1664 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:29:10 +0000 rob1053 1664@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@admin<br /> There is a small problem with Live reports.<br /> Say I want to make a report on vessel A.I go to the detail page,select Port Report from the drop down menu,type my report and send-No problem! I then go to make the same report for vessel B,I go to the detail page but this time select my previous message and send-Problem it will not send! Could you have a look at this for me.</p> <p>One other last little request(I know they are never little! :-) ) Would it be posible to put in a system where I could hover over the moving display to stop it so that I can note down a request.At the moment the only way I have found is to quickly click on the vessel name which opens the detail page and then read the message. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1604 Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:31:29 +0000 rob1053 1604@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Lars<br /> the idea of standard messages is a good idea<br /> Short standard messages make the moving display easier to read.<br /> I have been playing with it since it started in I have come round to this format :-</p> <p>dd.mm hh:mm UTC Now (location) to (destination) due dd.mm hh.mm UTC</p> <p>The system generates the vessel name so no need to put that in!</p> <p>Example for the vessel Leander</p> <p>27.06 08:00 UTC Now Margate Roads to Vopak London 1 due 28.06 14:00 UTC</p> <p>This is quick,simple and gives all the relevent info-if you do not know the destination you simply put unknown and leave the due info off.</p> <p>Do you think we should start a forum topic titled,say, STANDARD MESSAGE FORMATS and Tag it</p> <p>Also what are your thaughts on the extranious messages such as :- where ship? or I sailed on this boat and similar.<br /> They are not Live Reports.If you are happy to have location requests then,maybe, we should have a standard message format for them.</p> <p>Regards<br /> Rob </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1599 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:52:50 +0000 MindOpen 1599@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob: do not care about the size of the messages, there is plenty of space.<br /> We have to monitor this function for a while, to leran how people will make use of it. It is something like the twitter for spotters or SMS for vessels.<br /> We think of alll kind of extensions, but first we have to have experiences... :-)</p> <p>Since we do not know about the position of the reproting person and the relevant timeframe, UTC time would be perfect. It gives a good start to decide about the value of actuality to show it to people from all over the world.</p> <p>We should start a list of examples for standard messages, to give users hints for posting? </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/unable-to-see-the-ship#post-1572 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:47:47 +0000 rob1053 1572@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>Another test<br /> <a href="http://tinypic.com"><img src="http://i48.tinypic.com/vxm0k6.jpg" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic" /></a> </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/unable-to-see-the-ship#post-1569 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:27:05 +0000 miraflores 1569@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>only a test:</p> <p><a href="http://de.tinypic.com"><img src="http://i47.tinypic.com/8vt5kh.jpg" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic" /></a> </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1555 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:19:34 +0000 rob1053 1555@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@lars How would you prefer time to be quoted in live reports Local or UTC? </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/detail-page-not-available-even-though-logged-in#post-1553 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:52 +0000 ianegpf 1553@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>trying to get voyage related info and movements for MV Minerva but no info been available for a number of days....tells me to login or register but already logged in....tried it from scratch without logon first, then loged in with same result. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1551 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:58:13 +0000 rob1053 1551@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Lars<br /> Have read through your reply.I have no problem in entering reports I was just a little concerned for the size my 'My Live Reports'file will grow to.Currently 17 reports.<br /> I note that reports remain on the live reports 'ticker tape' for just over a day and then disappear however they remain on' My Live Reports 'page and it is here that I find that the delete button does not work.<br /> With regard to my no longer valid report comment I made consider the fillowing scenario<br /> At 22:20 I report Vessel X in Margate Roads<br /> At 23:00 I add a further report that the pilot has boarded and the vessel has departed.</p> <p>The 22:00 Report is no longer valid or has any meaning as the vellel is nolonger in margate Roads but is underway </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/page-errors#post-1550 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:58:05 +0000 IanJohn 1550@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>Ports, Aberdeen and User Details, Käpt'nBrass still not working. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/page-errors#post-1549 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:52:41 +0000 MindOpen 1549@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>desribed Probs should be fixed by now </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1548 Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:48:56 +0000 MindOpen 1548@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob: it is not our intention for the reports to get deleted only because they are outdated. The system is rather ment as a place for the quick and dirty placement of reports. We will later on have a system to reflect actuality a bit more depending on the amount of use.<br /> Your idea of easing the input of messages is good and should be added (but it is more work than just having an edit - button :-). For now I would suggest to have an textfile open, where you keep the most common messages for quick copies.</p> <p>The system also is a test scenario for our automatically created (still to be translated into english) zone alerts. At the vessels detailpage we will mix user and system messages for faster checking. The more zones we create in ports the more detailed this messages will be. In the future we will create all journey related reports with the system. </p> <p>I would like to ask all members, what Ideas for standard reports are of interest ? </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/live-reports#post-1545 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:49:17 +0000 rob1053 1545@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@admin.Have a problom with the new Live Reports system.I have two reports fo Eli Knutsen that are no longer valid as I have posted an update.<br /> When I click on delete in My Live Reports no delete occurs,I have tried refreshing and logging in and out to no avail,please investigate.<br /> Could you,also.consider an edit button that the poster could use to save retyping a whole report when only an update is required(as is provided on the forum page) as this would save typing.<br /> It is my intention to issue reports of vessels anchored in Margate Roads that appear on the ais data that I upload and to obtain where possible port arival times and/or pilot details (when I hear them ) and final movement from anchorage. I need to be able to delete and woukd like to update or My Live Reports page will be overwelmed with out of date reports.</p> <p>Regards<br /> Rob </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/new-the-wk-digital-seascom-website#post-1544 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:27:03 +0000 rob1053 1544@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>I love it Stevo! Funiest thing I have come across in a long time good one. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/new-the-wk-digital-seascom-website#post-1543 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:40:53 +0000 MindOpen 1543@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>RocknRoll man. I do have around 400Watts Bass under my desk, so just imagine the chock... thanks Stevo, lol </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/new-the-wk-digital-seascom-website#post-1542 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:30:15 +0000 Smutje 1542@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>I love it! I'll have it on all day today! ;-) </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/new-the-wk-digital-seascom-website#post-1541 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:56:38 +0000 Anonymous 1541@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>View <a href="http://www.vuvuzela-time.co.uk/www.digital-seas.com">here</a> the new WK Digital-Seas.Com website </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1487 Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:38:54 +0000 rob1053 1487@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>Ian has good idea there.<br /> In the case of Yantlet I suspect that the Imo no of 1 was generated by the ship ais system,I believe I can recall seeing 1 in the IMO field on the AIS info at the time, its the old rubbish in rubbish out senario.<br /> I know data is frequently incorrectly entered as you often hear Dover Coastguard querying a name,IMO No or status with comercial vessels. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1486 Sun, 06 Jun 2010 09:56:24 +0000 IanJohn 1486@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>By entering any random number in the IMO field can only store up problems for the future. May I suggest that the field can be made to accept ‘NOT KNOWN’ and only this is used. If this is not possible then ‘0000000’ should be entered. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1485 Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:46:20 +0000 rob1053 1485@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>Yesssssss.Thanks,Lars,I have never actualy loaded images this way I have always used tiny image uploader.</p> <p>I am now a happy man!</p> <p>Regards<br /> Rob </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1483 Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:22:46 +0000 MindOpen 1483@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob: but you know, that you can always upload any vessel image first with the ImageManager and then attach it later on to the right vessel-corpus (searching for IMO, MMSI or callsign) ?<br /> Are you trying the TinyImageUploader only? There are quiet some vessels in the DB wiht IMO=1, the tinyuploader still has a problem with those entries.<br /> Go to <a href="http://www.digital-seas.com/open_space/my_digital_seas/my_images.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.digital-seas.com/open_space/my_digital_seas/my_images.html</a> , upload your image (green button = add image) and I could help to attach it right.... </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1481 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:01:11 +0000 IanJohn 1481@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>Oh dear!!!! </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1480 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:07:50 +0000 rob1053 1480@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Ian.Ihave already tried 8 or 10 times both as rob1053 and rob1053mobile,I have shut down,restarted,closed down background programs,shut down the AIS direct upload,I even tried uploading another oddity to see if that would load-the Dover AIS station- and it did but nothing will allow me to upload poor old Yantlet's image!</p> <p>Rob </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1479 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:43:01 +0000 IanJohn 1479@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob, I know that doing that sometimes works. All I can sugest is that you try again and !!!!!<br /> Ian </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1478 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:36:04 +0000 rob1053 1478@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Ian.I have just rechecked My Images it is detinitely not there or assigned to a different vessel.<br /> Rob </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1477 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:27:09 +0000 IanJohn 1477@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob, Have you looked in 'My Images'? Your picture could be there, if it is attach it to the vessel.<br /> Regards,<br /> Ian </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/vessel-detail-errors#post-1476 Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:51:53 +0000 rob1053 1476@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@admin<br /> Vessel Name: YANTLET<br /> MMSI No:232004583 (Confirmed in the field by my mobile AIS)<br /> Nature of problem:<br /> The vessel is a ligitimate target,it is a work vessel managed by The Port of London Authority.<br /> When you open its page it appears to have an IMO No 1<br /> It also appears to have had 30 previous identities</p> <p>When I attempt to upload an image the image upoader will allow me to select an image and the save button goes green however it then tells me that a vessel with the name YANTLET and an IMO No 1 does not exist. If I then delete the IMO No1 the uploader allows me to select an image but the save button does not go green.</p> <p>I realise that the Vessel Detail page is generated automaticaly but there appears to be an error somewhere that is blocking the image upload.<br /> Could you investigate the problem so that I can give the vessel a 'face'</p> <p>Regards<br /> Rob(rob1053) </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/page-errors#post-1463 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:55:46 +0000 IanJohn 1463@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@ Lars, Felix, Latest Additions, New Vessels, New WIKI edits, Most Images, New Images, and New Users. Now working. </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/page-errors#post-1461 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:45:35 +0000 MindOpen 1461@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>We are aware of the Problems in the Port section, which will be fixed in an hour.<br /> Still have to evaluate other described sections. The security issue is new although. Browserlab (adobe) gives a complete platform test, will run this today.<br /> Hang on and thanks for telling us... </p> http://forum.digital-seas.com/topic/page-errors#post-1459 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:07:48 +0000 IanJohn 1459@http://forum.digital-seas.com/ <p>@Rob I use Firefox, I will not change my settings yet. @Lars, Felix, I will wait and see what you can do.<br /> Ian </p>